Medical Esthetics Sponsored by
cosmetic treatment with botox injection
|
Botox* |
Reloxin** |
|
|
Product source |
Purified form of botulinum exotoxin A |
Purified form of botulinum exotoxin A |
|
Indications |
Frown lines between eyes, forehead wrinkles, crow’s-feet, upper lip, lower face and neck |
Frown lines between eyes, forehead, crow’s-feet, upper lip, lower neck |
|
Onset |
Three days—the peak effect takes place 7–10 days after treatment |
2–3 days—the peak effect takes place 7–10 days after treatment |
|
Duration |
3–4 months |
3–4 months |
|
Treatment protocol |
A series of injections every 3–4 months |
A series of injections every 3–4 months |
|
Cost |
$400–1,500, depending on the number of injections and the amount of material used |
$400–1,500, depending on the number of injections and the amount of material used |
|
Benefits |
Temporarily paralyzes the muscles that cause lines through negative facial expressions |
Temporarily paralyzes the muscles that cause lines through negative facial expressions |
|
Risks |
If performed properly, almost none, although bruising, an incomplete effect, brow droop, eyelid droop, lip droop and asymmetry of the effect can occur. |
If performed properly, almost none, although bruising, an incomplete effect, brow droop, eyelid droop, lip droop and asymmetry of the effect can occur. |
|
Bovine collagen |
Human collagen |
Porcine collagen |
|
|
Product source |
Naturally occurring protein from purified cow skin |
Naturally occurring protein from lab-grown human foreskin tissue |
Porcine (pig) tendons |
|
Indications |
Fine and moderately deep lines and creases around eyes and lips; lip and lip edge augmentation; scars |
Cosmoderm* for superficial lines, glabellar lines, lip edge; Cosmoplast* for superficial and moderately deep lines and wrinkles, lip edge, lip body and acne scars |
Evolence Breeze** for superficial lines, glabellar lines, lip edge, lip body; Evolence** for lip edge, lip body, and superficial and moderately deep lines and acne scars |
|
Duration |
2–6 months |
2–6 months |
Long-lasting temporary—at least 12 months |
|
Treatment protocols |
A series of injections every 2–6 months |
A series of injections every 3–4 months |
One time per year |
|
Cost |
$400–800 per syringe |
$400–800 |
$600–1,000 per syringe |
|
Benefits |
Versatile, short-acting filler |
Versatile, short-acting filler |
Versatile, short to mid duration-acting filler |
|
Risks |
Allergic reaction, required skin test, bruising, swelling, incomplete correction, asymmetric results |
Rare allergic reaction, bruising, swelling, incomplete correction, asymmetric |
Rare allergic reaction, bruising, swelling, incomplete correction, asymmetric |
|
Restylane and Perlane* |
Juvéderm Ultra and Ultra Plus** |
|
|
Product source |
Genetically engineered streptococci |
Hyaluronic acid |
|
Indications |
Lips, nasolabial folds, marionette lines, tear trough, adding volume to cheeks |
Lips, nasolabial folds, marionette lines, tear trough, adding volume to cheeks |
|
Duration |
6+ months |
6+ months |
|
Treatment protocols |
A series of injections every 4–8 months |
A series of injections every 4–8 months |
|
Cost |
$600–1,000 |
$600–1,000 |
|
Benefits |
Natural looking results; lasts for at least 6 months; Restylane good for finesse areas; Perlane good as an underlay and for volume enhancement |
Natural looking results; lasts for at least 6 months; Ultra good for finesse areas; Ultra Plus good as an underlay and for volume enhancement |
|
Risks |
1–2 days of redness, swelling, bruising, tenderness |
Less redness and swelling than with Restylane and Perlane |
|
Radiesse* |
Sculptra** |
Autologous fat |
|
|
Product source |
Calcium hydroxyl apatite |
Poly-L-lactic acid |
Fat harvested from other parts of the body. |
|
Indications |
A volume filler for deep nasolabial folds, marionette lines, and hollow cheeks. |
A volume filler for deep nasolabial folds, marionette lines, and hollow cheeks. |
A volume filler for deep nasolabial folds, marionette lines and fat loss related to aging |
|
Duration |
12–18 months after a single treatment; if a touch-up treatment is provided, results are even better and duration is longer |
1–2 years after a series of between 3–6 treatments |
Six months to life-long; results are best and effect is longer if one or two touch-ups take place |
|
Treatment protocols |
Every 12–18 months |
May need touch-ups |
May need touch-ups; varied by individual |
|
Cost |
$800–2,000 per treatment |
$800–2,000 per treatment |
$1,000–4,500 |
|
Benefits |
Allergic reactions are rare, and results are long-lasting. |
Allergic reactions are rare, and results are long-lasting. |
No possibility of allergic reaction, ubiquitous material, natural appearance |
|
Risks |
Swelling, redness, bruising and lumping |
Redness, swelling, bruising and lumping; requires a series of treatments to obtain the desired effect |
Redness, swelling and bruising |
|
Artefill* |
Silicone |
|
|
Product source |
Synthetic beads of methyl methacrylate in a base of bovine collagen |
Liquid form of the chemical polymer silicone |
|
Indications |
Superficial, moderate and deep lines and folds, acne scars, volume loss |
Lips, acne scars, sunken cheeks, nasolabial folds and marionette lines |
|
Duration |
Permanent |
Permanent |
|
Treatment protocols |
One treatment with one or two touch-ups provides the best result |
Depends on number of sites and amount of correction desired |
|
Cost |
$2,500 |
$500–1,000 per injection |
|
Benefits |
Long-lasting benefit; once the desired result is achieved, touch-ups are needed only as the client ages and lines deepen with time |
Long-lasting benefit after a series of treatments; once the desired result is achieved, touch-ups are needed only as the client ages and lines deepen with time |
|
Risks |
Swelling, redness, bruising and permanent lumps; should not be used in the lips |
Swelling, redness, bruising permanent lumps, and the rare possibility of a late foreign body reaction or migration of the material |
Until recently, the only effective procedure available to the individual wanting appearance enhancement was a face lift. Throughout the past few years, treatments featuring Botox and fillers, as well as laser and light procedures—in conjunction with good skin care—have revolutionized the ability to rejuvenate an aging face.
According to a consumer survey by the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) of 1,000 American households in 2007, 83% of women and 78% of men would not be embarrassed to undergo cosmetic surgery. This has been a major shift in society’s views toward cosmetic procedures. It has become trendy to openly contemplate procedures with peers, discuss a physician’s techniques and compare results. This trend, however, is occurring in regard to noninvasive, nonsurgical procedures. Recent statistics from the ASAPS reveal that, of 11.4 million procedures performed, 17%—or 1.9 million—were surgical, such as face lifts, eyelid lifts and liposuction, while 83%—or 9.5 million—were nonsurgical, such as the injection of Botox and fillers, and laser and light-based treatments.
While face lifts are surgical procedures associated with anxiety, high cost,and significant recovery periods, filler and Botox treatments are relatively simple, safe, quick, relatively inexpensive and, in many instances, without downtime. Many individuals who would never consider a cosmetic surgical procedure are happy to have a noninvasive procedure. Because of this, the potential pool of candidates has increased dramatically.
At the same time, there have been incredible technological developments related to these noninvasive options. Product and equipment manufacturers have initiated more aggressive marketing approaches, using increasingly sophisticated and expensive direct-to-consumer television and print campaigns.
Since the early 1900s, there has been an interest in finding filler substances to enhance the face. The goal was safe and effective tissue augmentation. The early history, however, is full of examples of poor results and terrible reactions.