At the Personal Care Products Council’s 2008 annual meeting, National Media analysts Alex Castallonos and Bruce Haynes noted that consumers receive disorienting information regarding personal care products from a range of sources, and this information is rarely pro-industry. In this environment, more than 70% of natural product consumers believe that it is important to do business with environmentally responsible companies, according to a recent study conducted by Mambo Sprouts Marketing. This same group also says it will pay up to 20% more for green products. In this context, personal care and beauty products boasting organic compliance have been growing by about 15% annually. Yet confusion with the definition and standards of “organic” abounds, particularly in the personal care and cosmetic category—a dangerous scenario for the industry.
Since 1991, Ecocert (www.ecocert.com) has conducted organic certification in more than 80 countries for a range of fragranced products, including perfumes, detergents and cosmetics. Ecocert demands that a product contain at least 10% organic content to qualify for labeling. In the United States, where no official organic certification exists for the personal care and cosmetic categories, some companies have informally adhered to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program (USDA-NOP; www.ams.usda.gov/nop/indexIE.htm).
“The USDA’s food standards were never designed for [the personal care and cosmetic] industry, and its strict guidelines limit even certain types of ‘green chemistry’ and pose significant challenges for those seeking to create certified organic products,” says Oasis founding member Tim Kapsner, senior research scientist, Aveda.
Oasis (oasisseal.org), which stands for Organic and Sustainable Industry Standards, is a new industry-led organic labeling effort that addresses the standards gap which exists around the globe while providing wiggle room for formulators as green chemistry evolves. As of press time, Oasis is backed by 30 brand owners, fragrance houses and ingredient suppliers—including Estée Lauder, L’Oréal, Cognis and Oh, Oh Organic. New members will be added on an ongoing basis.
“Since there aren’t any [U.S. organic] regulations in the industry,” Kapsner continues, “producers can say anything they want on an organic label. They can say ‘this is a certified organic product,’ and it doesn’t really have to contain any significant amount of organic content. That confuses customers as to what products are truly organic. There’s no way to judge what a company’s doing, versus what it’s saying right now.”
Founding member Karl Halpert (Private Label Select) adds, “One of our main missions with this is to create some clarity amidst all the chaos.”
Oasis has set its standards as follows:
• A requirement for 85% organic content. This percentage will be continuously evaluated by the Oasis board and eventually raised to 95%. Kapsner notes that no timeline has been set.
• Allowance for up to 15% nonorganic content produced via green chemistry. (See “12 Principles of Green Chemistry.”1)
• No petroleum chemistry is allowed.
Halpert estimates that many allied companies will quickly begin the certification process, which is overseen by the Oasis board and technical review committee, though validation is carried out by an independent third party. “I think you’ll start to see [certified products] within 12 months,” he says, though Kapsner points out that, “some companies can move faster than others, so it’s hard to say how fast it’s going to be.”
Challenges of Raw Material Sourcing
“The biggest [challenge] is supply and demand,” says Kapsner, explaining that certified organic raw material sources for formulators will be the industry’s biggest challenge. “That’s part of the reason why Oasis decided to set the organic content requirement at 85%. It’s high enough to create a demand so that the finished product companies will need to look to their suppliers to supply them with certified organic versions of cosmetic ingredients so that they can meet the standard. That’s the whole objective: get that organic requirement up high enough so that it drives the production of more organic agriculture.”
Halpert adds some personal experience. “I’m a private label manufacturer,” he says, “and I can tell you that one of our challenges as we create a product for a customer [is that as] the orders get large, we start worrying about supply.”
To continue reading this article, please click here. You will be redirected to GCI magazine's Web site.
An Oasis in the Land of Confusion
May 7, 2008
Most Popular in Regulations
- 526Special Events Now Allowed for Texas Cosmetologists
- 414FDA Warns Against Injectable Skin Lighteners
- 383Ethical Labels Crossing Over into Cosmetics
- 336Setting the Microneedling Record Straight
- 280Good News for Lips and Med Spas
- 208Washington State's New Licensing Law for Estheticians
- 170The Ban of Microbeads Continues to Progress State to State
- 153North Dakota Creates Master Cosmetologist License
- 149AmSpa Launches First Ever State-By-State Summary of Medical Spa Laws
- 113Will Cruelty-free Skin Care Become the New Norm?
- PBA Calls for Prevention of Deregulation of Missouri Cosmetology and Barbering Industry
2/28/2014, Kristen Wegrzyn
- The Ban of Microbeads Continues to Progress State to State
3/25/2015, Jeb Gleason-Allured
- Becoming Involved in Licensure and the State Board
6/27/2014, Christine Heathman
- PBA Supports New Wisconsin Cosmetology Bill
5/6/2014, Kristen Wegrzyn
- Oregon Creates Energy Device Licensure for Esthys
7/27/2015, Mary Nielsen